Prosecution offers no new evidence in Russian human rights test case

The human rights test case involving Jehovah’s Witnesses opened in Moscow today with a sense of farce.

After six years of criminal investigation and legal process, including a trial that lasted two years, the sum of evidence produced in court by prosecutor, Tatyana Kondratyeva, was a list of articles of which she disapproved that had appeared in The Watchtower magazine, published by Jehovah’s Witnesses, and photocopies of Biblical material considered at Witness meetings throughout the world.

Ms. Kondratyeva said she was unable to provide any specific evidence of wrongdoing by members of the Witnesses’ congregations.

Defence counsel motions to dismiss the trial based on the violations of the European Convention on Human Rights were denied.

Defence counsel Artur Leontyev referred the court to the finding of the European Court at Strasbourg in a 1996 decision in favour of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Manoussakis v. Greece): “The right to freedom of religion as guaranteed under the Convention excludes any discretion on the part of the State to determine whether religious beliefs or the means used to express such beliefs are legitimate.”

At stake is the freedom of worship of 10,000 Jehovah’s Witnesses in Moscow and 120,000 members of their 400 registered congregations throughout Russia. The Prosecution’s drive to liquidate the Witnesses in Moscow and throughout Russia has triggered fears among Human rights observers that this will have a domino effect as they move against other non-Orthodox faiths.

Chair of the International Helsinki Group in Moscow, Ludmilla Alexseyeva, commented: “Modern-day persecution of Jehovah’s Witnesses has been carrying on for six years. Surely it will not take another six years before justice triumphs.”