Fearing that the best-selling novel "The Da Vinci Code" may be sowing doubt about basic Christian beliefs, a host of Christian churches, clergy members and Bible scholars are rushing to rebut it.
In the past 13 months, readers have bought more than 6 million copies of the book, a historical thriller that claims Christianity was founded on a cover-up -- that the church has conspired for centuries to hide evidence that Jesus was a mere mortal, married Mary Magdalene and had children whose descendants now live in France.
Word that director Ron Howard is making a movie based on the book has only intensified the critics' urgency. More than 10 books are being released, most in April and May, with titles that promise to break, crack, unlock or decode "The Da Vinci Code." Churches are offering pamphlets and study guides for readers who may have been prompted by the novel to question their faith. Large audiences are showing up for Da Vinci Code lectures and sermons.
"Because this book is such a direct attack against the foundation of the Christian faith, it's important that we speak out," said the Rev. Erwin W. Lutzer, author of "The Da Vinci Deception" and senior pastor of Moody Church in Chicago, an influential evangelical pulpit.
"I don't think it's just an innocent novel with a fascinating plot," said James L. Garlow, co-author of "Cracking Da Vinci's Code" and pastor of Skyline Wesleyan Church in San Diego. "I think it's out there to win people over to an incorrect and historically inaccurate view, and it's succeeding. People are buying into the notion that Jesus is not divine, he is not the son of God."
Among "The Da Vinci Code" critics are evangelical Protestants and Roman Catholics who regard the novel -- which is laced with passages celebrating feminism, anticlericalism and pagan forms of worship -- as another infiltration by liberal cultural warriors. They also say the book exploits public distrust of the Catholic Church in the aftermath of the clergy sexual-abuse scandal.
The debunking books range from scholarly hardcovers to slim study guides. Among the publishers are well-known Christian houses like Tyndale and Thomas Nelson, to less-familiar outfits. Since most of the books have either appeared in stores very recently or have not yet been published, it is too early to say how they are selling.
Surfing the wave The critics and their publishers are also hoping to surf the wave of success of "The Da Vinci Code," which has been at the top of The New York Times hardcover fiction best-seller list for 56 weeks. There are 7.2 million copies of the book, published by Doubleday, now in print. Of the 10 new Da Vinci-related books, eight are by Christian publishers. One evangelical Christian publisher, Tyndale House, which hit gold with the "Left Behind" books, is about to issue not one but two titles rebutting "The Da Vinci Code."
Dan Brown, the former schoolteacher who wrote "The Da Vinci Code," is declining all interview requests, his publisher says, because he is at work on his next book. But Brown says on his Web site that he welcomes the scholarly debates over his book. He says that while it is a work of fiction, "it is my own personal belief that the theories discussed by these characters have merit."
"The Da Vinci Code" taps into growing public fascination with the origins of Christianity. More scholars have been writing popular books about the relatively recent, tantalizing archaeological discoveries of Gnostic gospels and texts that offer insights into early Christians whose beliefs departed from the gospels in the New Testament.
The plot of "The Da Vinci Code" is a twist on the ancient search for the Holy Grail. Robert Langdon, portrayed as a brilliant Harvard professor of "symbology," and Sophie Neveu, a gorgeous Parisian police cryptographer, team up to decipher a trail of clues left behind by the murdered curator at the Louvre Museum, who turns out to be Neveu's grandfather.
The pair discover that the grandfather had inherited Leonardo da Vinci's mantle as the head of a secret society. The society guards the Holy Grail, which is not a chalice, but is instead the proof of Jesus and Mary Magdalene's conjugal relationship; Langdon and Neveu must race the killer to find it. Along the way they learn that the church has suppressed 80 early gospels that denied the divinity of Jesus, elevated Mary Magdalene to a leader among the apostles and celebrated the worship of female wisdom and sexuality.
The novel, in which even chapters only two pages long end with a cliffhanger, might seem like little more than an unabashed potboiler. But it opens with a page titled "Fact." That page concludes: "All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate."
Opus Dei response The book portrays Opus Dei, a conservative worldwide network of Catholic priests and laity, as a sinister and sadistic sect. In the book, an albino Opus Dei monk assassinates four people who guard the secret about the union of Jesus and Mary Magdalene.
The real Opus Dei has posted a lengthy response to "The Da Vinci Code" on its Web site, warning, "It would be irresponsible to form any opinion of Opus Dei based on reading 'The Da Vinci Code."'
Our Sunday Visitor, the Catholic publishing company, has published a book and a pamphlet offering a Catholic response to the book. The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America has also issued its own guide.
Old debates Though for many readers the notions about Christian history in "The Da Vinci Code" seem new and startling, the novel introduces to a popular audience some of the debates that have gripped scholars of early Christian history for decades.
The academic chatter grew louder after the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in a cave in the Judean desert in the 1950s, and of ancient texts in Nag Hammadi, Egypt, in 1945. Among the findings were early Christian scriptures and fragments that were not included in the New Testament, including writings that scholars have come to call the "Gospels" of Mary, Peter, Phillip, Thomas and Q.
"The Da Vinci Code" floats the notion that the fourth-century Roman emperor Constantine suppressed the earlier gospels for political reasons and imposed the doctrine of the divinity of Christ at the Council of Nicaea in A.D. 325. A character in "The Da Vinci Code" points out that it is history's winners who get to write history, a refrain echoed by Brown on his Web site.
Christian scholars across the theological spectrum agree the depiction of the Council of Nicaea is one of the book's most blatant distortions. They agree that while there was a diversity of early expressions of Christianity, the divinity of Jesus was part of the church's established canons well before 325, and predates most of the newly found Gnostic and other gospels.
"People were thinking Jesus was divine in some sense or another from the first century on," said Harold W. Attridge, dean of Yale Divinity School and a translator and authority on the Nag Hammadi trove.
Attridge, who gave a lecture on "The Da Vinci Code" in California last week, said that while he welcomed it as a "teaching opportunity," the book "takes facts and gives them a spin that distorts them seriously."
Much of "The Da Vinci Code" scaffolding of conspiracies was constructed in an earlier best seller, "Holy Blood, Holy Grail," published in the 1980s. It relies on a file of documents found in the Bibliotheque Nationale de France that has since been exposed as one man's hoax.
Darrell L. Bock, a professor of New Testament studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, sees "The Da Vinci Code" not merely as an effort to undermine traditional Christian belief but also to "redefine Christianity and the history of Christianity."
"That's why you see so many Christian people react to a novel," said Bock, author of "Breaking the Da Vinci Code."
There is evidence that Brown's novel could indeed be shaping the beliefs of a generation that is famously biblically illiterate. Michael S. Martin, a high school French teacher in Burlington, Vt., said he decided to read "The Da Vinci Code" when he noticed that his students were reading it in Harry Potter proportions.
"We like conspiracy theories, so whether it's JFK or Jesus, people want to think there's something more than what they are telling us -- the they in this case being the church," Martin said. "The church has a long and documented history of really trying to crush the whole feminine side, the pagan side. I think that's really hard to debate."